Difference between revisions of "Itega-governance-stepanovich"
From IVP Wiki
(→SEE ALSO:) |
(→Stakeholders (thought exercise draft)) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
**Freedom of Expression Experts | **Freedom of Expression Experts | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==SEE ALSO:== | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Notes from 2010-2017 of potential member classes: | ||
+ | ===http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form=== | ||
+ | |||
**Technologists / Engineers | **Technologists / Engineers | ||
**Journalists | **Journalists | ||
− | |||
==Proposed tiered structure== | ==Proposed tiered structure== |
Revision as of 21:40, 15 February 2019
Contents
JAN. 16, 2019 NOTES FROM:
Amie Stepanovich
U.S. Policy Manager | Global Policy Counsel
Access Now Washington, D.C. | accessnow.org
tel: +1.202.573.4721
amie@accessnow.org
People I would highly recommend outreach with:
- Ian Glazer, https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglazer
- Michael Garcia, https://www.zdnet.com/article/gov-led-id-plan-has-new-leader-new-phase-new-goals/
- Jeremy Grant, https://www.venable.com/jeremy-a-grant/
What is ITEGA?
Pyramid strucure
- Membership > Advisory Board > Governing Board > Board of Director
Stakeholders (thought exercise draft)
- Publishers - either as a whole or divided into two separate groups
- “Large Publishers”
- “Small/Medium Publishers”
- Private Sector (could also be a group of large / small)
- Advertisers
- Technical Service Providers
- Identity Service Providers
- “Public” (unaffiliated, independent individuals)
- Academic
- Civil Society either as a whole or divided into separate groups
- Privacy Experts
- Freedom of Expression Experts
SEE ALSO:
- Notes from 2010-2017 of potential member classes:
- Technologists / Engineers
- Journalists
Proposed tiered structure
Small Board of Directors (perhaps 1/stakeholder group)
- Governing Board (3-5/stakeholder group - set working groups, draft documents, consult between Board of Directors, Advisory Board, Membership)
- Advisory Board (10-15/stakeholder group - large set consulted for general expertise and feedback)
- Membership at large - this could just be publishers or interested parties at large
- (Thought of representatives elected equally between those who are promoted from within the stakeholder group and those promoted by the group at large-- think of U.S. Senate v. HoR)
- Note IDESG as a model: https://idesg.edufoundation.kantarainitiative.org/index.html
- Note also the transparency/documentation inherent in their development of documents and policies: https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Privacy_Requirements
Term limits?