Difference between revisions of "Blueprint-tech-agenda"
From IVP Wiki
(→A. Information Valet Service mission 11 a.m. -11:30 a.m.) |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==H. Next steps== | ==H. Next steps== | ||
*Confirm next steps. | *Confirm next steps. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Jeff's observation== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jeff VanderClute observes in email:<br> | ||
+ | This can probably just be stated verbally, but I'd like the group to | ||
+ | give itself permission to view Information Valet as a multiphase | ||
+ | evolution, so that we're not trying to solve too many problems | ||
+ | simultaneously. |
Latest revision as of 17:01, 31 December 2008
Contents
- 1 A. Information Valet Service mission 11 a.m. -11:30 a.m.
- 2 B. Ownership, control structure -- 11:30 a.m.-11:45 a.m.
- 3 C. Potential role of The Associated Press -- 11:45 a.m.-noon
- 4 D. Elements of the service -- noon-1 p.m.
- 5 E. Lunch (in the hotel restaurant -- half the cost of catering)
- 6 F. The nuts and bolts -- 1 p.m. - 3 p.m.
- 7 G. Documentation - 3 p.m.-3:45 p.m.
- 8 H. Next steps
- 9 Jeff's observation
A. Information Valet Service mission 11 a.m. -11:30 a.m.
- Confirm/revise today's agenda/schedule
- Confirm mission and any supporting objectives
B. Ownership, control structure -- 11:30 a.m.-11:45 a.m.
- Densmore outlines proposed corporate structure
C. Potential role of The Associated Press -- 11:45 a.m.-noon
- Randy Picht will use WebEx to present features of AP Exchange
D. Elements of the service -- noon-1 p.m.
- What problem(s) are we going to solve?
- Who are our target partners/customers?
- Discuss and reach consensus on the service features
- What are the relationships supported/enabled?
- What are the values exchanged?
- What are similar existing services?
E. Lunch (in the hotel restaurant -- half the cost of catering)
- Continue discussing features/relationships to be supported
F. The nuts and bolts -- 1 p.m. - 3 p.m.
- Diagram / agree on the relationships
- Be explicit about things InfoValet will **not** do (eg: determine pricing/bundling)
- Identify the necessary technologies, partners
- Define the relationships among them
- Determine what's off the shelf, or what needs to be built in terms of interfaces or missing pieces.
G. Documentation - 3 p.m.-3:45 p.m.
- Document our proposal sufficiently for Steve Mott/Bill Densmore to incorporate into the InfoValet Project development plan.
H. Next steps
- Confirm next steps.
Jeff's observation
Jeff VanderClute observes in email:
This can probably just be stated verbally, but I'd like the group to
give itself permission to view Information Valet as a multiphase
evolution, so that we're not trying to solve too many problems
simultaneously.